Why do the Tickborne and Gut Zoomer tests use real time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and not next generation sequencing (NGS)?

 

1. Targeting Specificity and Sensitivity

  • RT-PCR is designed to detect specific nucleic acid sequences with high sensitivity and specificity.
  • For known gut pathogens, validated primers and probes allow fast, accurate identification even at low pathogen loads.
  • NGS, on the other hand, sequences all nucleic acids in a sample. While this offers a broad, unbiased look, it may dilute signals from pathogens if they are present at low concentrations.

2. Speed and Turnaround Time

  • RT-PCR assays typically yield results in 2–4 hours.
  • NGS workflows require library preparation, sequencing (which can take 12–48 hours), and bioinformatics analysis, leading to total turnaround times of 24–72+ hours.

3. Cost and Complexity

  • RT-PCR is significantly more cost-effective and technically accessible for routine testing.
  • NGS requires expensive instruments, high reagent costs, and advanced computational infrastructure and personnel.

 

πŸ”„ Number of Cycles: RT-PCR vs NGS

RT-PCR:

  • RT-PCR typically runs for 40–45 cycles.
  • Each cycle amplifies the target sequence, and Ct (Cycle threshold) values reflect pathogen load.
  • The signal from fluorescent probes is detected in real-time, enabling quantitative output.

NGS:

  • NGS does not operate using amplification cycles in the same way as PCR.
  • It involves:
    • Library preparation, including PCR amplification (usually 12–18 PCR cycles) for adapter ligation and enrichment.
    • Sequencing cycles: Modern sequencers can perform 50–300 sequencing cycles, depending on read length (e.g., 2 Γ— 150 bp).
  • These cycles do not selectively amplify specific pathogens and instead sequence everything in the sample.

 

🧬 Probe Usage: RT-PCR vs NGS

RT-PCR:

  • Uses sequence-specific primers and fluorescent probes, such as TaqMan probes, for each target pathogen.
  • Multiplex RT-PCR panels can detect up to 20–30 pathogens in a single run.
  • The number of probes used is equal to the number of targets, plus internal controls. Each probe is uniquely labeled to avoid spectral overlap.

NGS:

  • No specific probes are required for pathogen detection.
  • Detection relies on computational alignment of sequencing reads to reference databases.
  • This makes it more flexible for discovering novel pathogens (e.g., COVID-19) but less targeted and efficient for detecting known organisms.

 

βœ… Summary: When RT-PCR Is Preferable

Feature RT-PCR NGS
Best for Known pathogens Novel/unknown pathogens
Targeting Specific (probe-based) Broad (unbiased)
Sensitivity for low-abundance targets High Variable
Number of cycles 40–45 (amplification) 12–18 (prep); 50–300 (sequencing)
Number of probes

1 probe per genus or species

*Vibrant uses 3-4 probes per pathogen to enhance sensitivity and specificity

None

RT-PCR is ideal when the goal is rapid, sensitive, and cost-effective detection of known gut pathogens. NGS has advantages when detecting rare, unknown, or co-infecting organisms in complex samples, but its time, cost, and complexity make it less practical for routine clinical diagnosis of well-characterized gut infections.

 

Was this article helpful?
0 out of 0 found this helpful