1. Targeting Specificity and Sensitivity
- RT-PCR is designed to detect specific nucleic acid sequences with high sensitivity and specificity.
- For known gut pathogens, validated primers and probes allow fast, accurate identification even at low pathogen loads.
- NGS, on the other hand, sequences all nucleic acids in a sample. While this offers a broad, unbiased look, it may dilute signals from pathogens if they are present at low concentrations.
2. Speed and Turnaround Time
- RT-PCR assays typically yield results in 2β4 hours.
- NGS workflows require library preparation, sequencing (which can take 12β48 hours), and bioinformatics analysis, leading to total turnaround times of 24β72+ hours.
3. Cost and Complexity
- RT-PCR is significantly more cost-effective and technically accessible for routine testing.
- NGS requires expensive instruments, high reagent costs, and advanced computational infrastructure and personnel.
π Number of Cycles: RT-PCR vs NGS
RT-PCR:
- RT-PCR typically runs for 40β45 cycles.
- Each cycle amplifies the target sequence, and Ct (Cycle threshold) values reflect pathogen load.
- The signal from fluorescent probes is detected in real-time, enabling quantitative output.
NGS:
- NGS does not operate using amplification cycles in the same way as PCR.
- It involves:
- Library preparation, including PCR amplification (usually 12β18 PCR cycles) for adapter ligation and enrichment.
- Sequencing cycles: Modern sequencers can perform 50β300 sequencing cycles, depending on read length (e.g., 2 Γ 150 bp).
- These cycles do not selectively amplify specific pathogens and instead sequence everything in the sample.
𧬠Probe Usage: RT-PCR vs NGS
RT-PCR:
- Uses sequence-specific primers and fluorescent probes, such as TaqMan probes, for each target pathogen.
- Multiplex RT-PCR panels can detect up to 20β30 pathogens in a single run.
- The number of probes used is equal to the number of targets, plus internal controls. Each probe is uniquely labeled to avoid spectral overlap.
NGS:
- No specific probes are required for pathogen detection.
- Detection relies on computational alignment of sequencing reads to reference databases.
- This makes it more flexible for discovering novel pathogens (e.g., COVID-19) but less targeted and efficient for detecting known organisms.
β Summary: When RT-PCR Is Preferable
| Feature | RT-PCR | NGS |
| Best for | Known pathogens | Novel/unknown pathogens |
| Targeting | Specific (probe-based) | Broad (unbiased) |
| Sensitivity for low-abundance targets | High | Variable |
| Number of cycles | 40β45 (amplification) | 12β18 (prep); 50β300 (sequencing) |
| Number of probes |
1 probe per genus or species *Vibrant uses 3-4 probes per pathogen to enhance sensitivity and specificity |
None |
RT-PCR is ideal when the goal is rapid, sensitive, and cost-effective detection of known gut pathogens. NGS has advantages when detecting rare, unknown, or co-infecting organisms in complex samples, but its time, cost, and complexity make it less practical for routine clinical diagnosis of well-characterized gut infections.